ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Temporal Dynamics of Sensitivity to Second-Order Facial Relations: Evidence from a Rapid ERP Adaptation Paradigm.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Second-order facial relations-the metric spacing among internal facial features-contribute to face individuation, but the temporal stages at which the brain differentiates repeatedly from changed relational information remain unclear. Using a rapid-adaptation EEG paradigm, seventy adults viewed S1-S2 face pairs derived from the same source identity, in which the spacing of the eyes and mouth was either repeated or changed while first-order facial layout was preserved. ERPs to S2 were analysed in the P1, N170, P2, and N250 time windows and complemented by cluster-based permutation tests. Repeated versus changed spacing did not reliably modulate the P1 or N170. Instead, a sustained posterior condition difference emerged after the N170 and extended across the conventionally defined P2 and N250 time ranges, with repeated spacing eliciting a more positive-going response than changed spacing across this interval. Cluster-based analyses confirmed that this difference extended across contiguous post-N170 time points and posterior electrodes. Under the present rapid-adaptation conditions, neural differentiation of repeated versus changed second-order relations was therefore most reliably expressed in later P2 and N250 activity. These findings do not imply that second-order information is absent from earlier processing stages, but identify a sustained post-N170 interval in which repeated and changed second-order relations were reliably differentiated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.