ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Processing Discontinuous Chinese Separable Words: Evidence from Eye Tracking.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chinese separable words combine lexical integrity with structural separability, but how readers process discontinuous forms during sentence reading remains unclear. Thirty native Chinese speakers read sentences containing discontinuous separable words, verb-object (V-O) phrases, or quasi-separable words (QSWs) while their eye movements were recorded. Corpus-derived discontinuous-structure frequency and local contextual surprisal were included as continuous predictors. Separable words did not differ reliably from V-O phrases in acceptability judgments or target-region eye-movement measures, suggesting no stable additional processing cost relative to the V-O baseline. QSWs were accepted less often, elicited longer judgment response times, and showed greater target-region processing difficulty. Within the QSW condition, higher frequency was associated with shorter response times and greater acceptance. After frequency and surprisal were added, all adjusted pairwise comparisons for the binary fixation measures were nonsignificant. For conditional durations, reliable adjusted differences were limited to V-O phrases versus QSWs; separable words did not differ reliably from either comparison condition. Higher surprisal predicted greater second-fixation probability. Together, these findings suggest that discontinuous separable words benefit from distributional and constructional support, allowing their components to enter V-O-like integration without obligatory lexical reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.