ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Mouse-Tracking Paradigm for Value-Driven Attentional Capture.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reward learning is fundamental to adaptive behavior and exhibits substantial individual variability linked to addiction and other psychiatric conditions. Traditional value-driven attentional capture (VDAC) paradigms rely mainly on reaction time (RT) and accuracy, but it remains unknown whether engaging motor control processes could enhance sensitivity for detecting individual differences in reward-induced attentional biases. We developed a novel mouse-tracking VDAC paradigm that engages motor control processes. Two independent samples (n1 = 45, n2 = 59) completed the task and a battery of reward-related psychological scales (reward sensitivity, impulsivity, self-control, digital addiction tendency). A new index, maximum deviation (MD) of mouse trajectories, quantified how reward history biases attention and motor response. The paradigm replicated the classic RT-based VDAC effect. Trajectory-based measures revealed bidirectional effects: high-value distractors increased attraction and reduced active avoidance. The relative angle modulated VDAC strength, with the largest effect at 120°. ΔMD (high-value vs. absent) showed significant positive correlations with reward sensitivity, impulsivity, and addiction tendency, and negative correlations with self-control in both samples, whereas ΔRT showed no significant correlations. The consistent pattern across two independent samples suggests that mouse-tracking provides a complementary, process-sensitive index for detecting individual differences in reward-driven attention. This paradigm may serve as a useful tool for investigating cognitive markers of vulnerability to reward-related disorders, including addiction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.