ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Barriers and Facilitators to Skin-to-Skin Contact After Caesarean Section: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesDespite its proven benefits, skin-to-skin contact (SSC) after caesarean section faces significant barriers to implementation. Complementing two previous randomised controlled trials conducted by our group, this descriptive qualitative study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators experienced by multidisciplinary healthcare teams, providing frontline insights into factors contributing to the inconsistent implementation of SSC.
methodsFollowing a phenomenological approach and the COREQ guidelines, 40 semi-structured interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals involved in caesarean care at a Spanish tertiary hospital, including anaesthetists, gynaecologists, neonatologists, midwives, nurses and nursing assistants. The data were thematically categorised at the semantic and pragmatic levels using MAXQDA software.
resultsSSC implementation remains inconsistent in routine care. Despite the existence of an established institutional protocol, systematic adherence is hindered by high clinical workload, infrastructure constraints and inconsistent dissemination of guidelines. Professional barriers included gaps in training and entrenched routines, while attitudinal barriers stemmed from safety concerns following major abdominal surgery. Key facilitators included the absence of clinical complications and the positive emotional impact of SSC on family bonding. These findings provide critical diagnostic insights into implementation barriers, informing future strategies to enhance adherence to established institutional protocols.
conclusionsAlthough safe and feasible, post-caesarean SSC remains inconsistently implemented due to addressable barriers. Its routine adoption requires targeted multidisciplinary training, commitment from healthcare teams and infrastructural adaptations in post-anaesthesia care units (PACU).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.