ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Use of Probiotics with Antibiotics: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices in Community Pharmacy.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAntibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) is a common consequence of gut microbiota disruption following broad-spectrum antibiotic use. Certain probiotics may reduce the incidence of AAD. However, their effectiveness also depends on appropriate counseling by community pharmacy professionals and implementation of evidence-based practice.
objectivesTo assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of community pharmacy professionals in North Macedonia regarding concomitant antibiotic-probiotic use and to identify factors associated with these domains.
methodsAn anonymous content-validated online questionnaire was distributed to a convenience sample of community pharmacists and pharmacy technicians in North Macedonia (April-May 2026). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, factor analysis, and regression models in Jamovi (version 2.6) and R software (version 4.4). A
resultsAmong 285 respondents (mean age 41.8 ± 9.6 years), 54.7% were classified in the high category of the survey-based knowledge index according to the prespecified survey key. Recognition of probiotic efficacy was high (95.8%), but alignment with the prespecified survey key regarding proper administration with food and risk identification was lower (34.6% and 66.8%, respectively). Attitudes toward probiotic use were highly positive, and recommendation practices were frequently reported (84.5%), although counseling practices varied. More positive attitudes were associated with higher recommendation behavior (β = 0.512,
conclusionsCommunity pharmacy professionals in North Macedonia demonstrated favorable attitudes and frequent self-reported recommendation practices regarding probiotic use alongside antibiotics. However, important gaps remain in clinical knowledge and counseling consistency. Targeted continuing professional education and development of standardized national guidelines may be considered, but their effects on observed practice and patient outcomes require prospective evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.