ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Effects of Different Nutritional Strategies on the Prevention and Management of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile nutritional interventions are pivotal for the prevention and management of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), the optimal nutritional strategy remains unclear.
methodsPubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Eligible studies targeted both GDM-diagnosed patients and high-risk cohorts, comparing nutritional interventions with standard controls. Data were extracted and synthesized through network meta-analyses to estimate the standardized mean difference (SMD) or relative risk (RR). The primary outcomes were incidence of GDM, fasting blood glucose (FBG), HOMA-IR, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), gestational weight gain (GWG), and cesarean section rate (CSR).
resultsA total of 59 trials involving 10,262 women evaluated 24 nutritional strategies. Among high-risk pregnant women, inositol was associated with a reduced incidence of GDM (RR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.37, 0.68; SUCRA = 84.5%) and lower FBG levels (SMD = -0.42, 95% CI: -0.66, -0.18; SUCRA = 89.8%). For CSR in high-risk pregnant women, blueberry combined with dietary fiber showed a favorable ranking (RR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.10, 0.90; SUCRA = 97.8%). Among patients with GDM, the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet showed a significant effect on HOMA-IR (SMD = -2.79, 95% CI: -4.49, -1.09; SUCRA = 95.9%). Plant sterols showed a favorable effect on HbA1c levels (SMD = -1.40, 95% CI: -2.00, -0.80; SUCRA = 95.7%). Fish oil was associated with reduced GWG (SMD = -0.44, 95% CI: -0.76, -0.12; SUCRA = 94.1%). Combined supplementation with magnesium, zinc, calcium, and vitamin D ranked favorably for CSR compared with the control group (RR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.15, 1.29; SUCRA = 82.1%), but this finding was based on limited evidence.
conclusionsCurrent evidence suggests that inositol, the DASH diet, plant sterols, and fish oil may play a positive role in the prevention and management of gestational diabetes. However, the effects of interventions with very high SUCRA scores but limited supporting evidence-such as blueberries combined with dietary fiber and magnesium-zinc-calcium-vitamin D supplements-should be interpreted with caution. Well-designed, large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed in the future to further confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.