ReviewBrain sciences2026
Mitochondrial Complex V Dysfunction in Neurodegeneration: Secondary Bystander or Primary Driver?
Review in Brain sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesMitochondrial Complex V (Complex V [CX-V], or ATP synthase) is the terminal enzyme of oxidative phosphorylation and is responsible for the majority of cellular ATP production. An increasing body of evidence suggests that CX-V dysfunction may contribute to mitochondrial impairment observed in neurodegenerative disease. This review evaluated current research on the structure, regulation, and function of CX-V, examined the consequences of CX-V dysfunction, and assessed its proposed role in neurodegenerative disorders.
methodsA comprehensive review of the published literature was carried out, with emphasis on primary research investigating CX-V structure and function, inherited CX-V disorders, and experimental evidence linking CX-V dysfunction to neurodegenerative disease. The reviewed studies used a range of experimental approaches, including structural biology, biochemical studies, patient-derived cellular models, animal models and post-mortem human tissue.
resultsCurrent evidence demonstrates that disruption of CX-V impairs ATP production, alters mitochondrial membrane potential, and oxidative phosphorylation, and that pathogenic variants cause primary mitochondrial disease. Across Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/frontotemporal dementia, glaucoma and inherited optic neuropathies, alterations in CX-V activity, regulation and structural integrity are consistently associated with mitochondrial dysfunction. Direct evidence supporting CX-V as a primary driver of neurodegeneration remains very limited, with many observations originating from broader studies of general mitochondrial dysfunction.
conclusionsCX-V dysfunction represents a recurring feature of mitochondrial impairment across a variety of neurodegenerative disorders and may exacerbate neuronal vulnerability by disrupting cellular bioenergetics. Current evidence indicates that CX-V may serve as a common downstream target of multiple pathological pathways rather than acting as a primary pathological factor. Future studies require direct assessment of CX-V activity in clinically relevant human models and patient tissues to determine its contribution to disease progression and examine its potential as a therapeutic target.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.