ReviewBrain sciences2026
How Long Is the Brain Perfusable After Global Ischemia? A Systematic Review.
Review in Brain sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlobal cerebral ischemia initiates a cascade of pathophysiological changes that progressively impair subsequent perfusion of brain tissue. Some authors have proposed that adequate cerebral perfusion becomes impossible after approximately 10-30 min of global ischemia. However, the extant evidence base for this threshold and its variations across studies has not yet been systematically examined.
objectiveTo synthesize the literature on post-ischemic cerebral perfusion success as a function of ischemia duration.
methodsWe searched PubMed (11 February 2026) for studies of global cerebral ischemia in animal or human models that reported quantitative or categorical measures of perfusion quality. Eligible studies included those assessing perfusion via restoration of blood flow, via external perfusion of non-blood solutions, and/or via tracer injection following reperfusion. Studies of focal ischemia were excluded. Data extracted included species, ischemia duration, temperature during ischemia, ischemia model, perfusate type, and perfusion quality assessment method. The perfusion quality outcome was operationalized as either the average percentage of brain tissue perfused or the percentage of brains in a group that was adequately perfused. Study quality was assessed using a custom domain-specific checklist.
resultsWe included 60 studies with 192 study arms reporting on the perfusion of the brains of rabbits, rats, pigs, dogs, cats, and humans. Studies differed in the model of ischemia, the perfusate, the perfusion parameters, the quality assessment methods, and other factors. Longer ischemia was associated with lower perfusion quality, but substantial heterogeneity across studies prevented identification of a consistent sharp temporal threshold. Some studies found that at least partial perfusion was possible after longer periods. Within-study dose-response curves were more consistent than the pooled cross-study pattern.
conclusionsHow long the brain remains perfusable after circulatory arrest has not yet been definitively established. On average, perfusion quality clearly declines rapidly as the duration of global cerebral ischemia increases. However, some studies, often using interventions such as hypothermia or vasopressors, have reported at least partial perfusion of the brain even after 30 or 60 min of ischemia. Moreover, at least partial perfusion has been reported in human brain banking studies after postmortem intervals of several hours or days in some donors. Limitations of this review include substantial heterogeneity in study methods and outcome measures, which precluded formal meta-analysis. Future research may benefit from more thorough and precise measures of perfusion quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.