Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42651190›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2026

How Long Is the Brain Perfusable After Global Ischemia? A Systematic Review.

Jeremy Kalfus, Devin Ward, Borys Wróbel, Andrew T McKenzie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jeremy KalfusApex Neuroscience, Salem, OR 97317, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-2030-0879
Devin WardApex Neuroscience, Salem, OR 97317, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-8488-6594
Borys WróbelNectome, Vancouver, WA 98682, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4759-725X
Andrew T McKenzieApex Neuroscience, Salem, OR 97317, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7462-4340

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobal cerebral ischemia initiates a cascade of pathophysiological changes that progressively impair subsequent perfusion of brain tissue. Some authors have proposed that adequate cerebral perfusion becomes impossible after approximately 10-30 min of global ischemia. However, the extant evidence base for this threshold and its variations across studies has not yet been systematically examined.

objectiveTo synthesize the literature on post-ischemic cerebral perfusion success as a function of ischemia duration.

methodsWe searched PubMed (11 February 2026) for studies of global cerebral ischemia in animal or human models that reported quantitative or categorical measures of perfusion quality. Eligible studies included those assessing perfusion via restoration of blood flow, via external perfusion of non-blood solutions, and/or via tracer injection following reperfusion. Studies of focal ischemia were excluded. Data extracted included species, ischemia duration, temperature during ischemia, ischemia model, perfusate type, and perfusion quality assessment method. The perfusion quality outcome was operationalized as either the average percentage of brain tissue perfused or the percentage of brains in a group that was adequately perfused. Study quality was assessed using a custom domain-specific checklist.

resultsWe included 60 studies with 192 study arms reporting on the perfusion of the brains of rabbits, rats, pigs, dogs, cats, and humans. Studies differed in the model of ischemia, the perfusate, the perfusion parameters, the quality assessment methods, and other factors. Longer ischemia was associated with lower perfusion quality, but substantial heterogeneity across studies prevented identification of a consistent sharp temporal threshold. Some studies found that at least partial perfusion was possible after longer periods. Within-study dose-response curves were more consistent than the pooled cross-study pattern.

conclusionsHow long the brain remains perfusable after circulatory arrest has not yet been definitively established. On average, perfusion quality clearly declines rapidly as the duration of global cerebral ischemia increases. However, some studies, often using interventions such as hypothermia or vasopressors, have reported at least partial perfusion of the brain even after 30 or 60 min of ischemia. Moreover, at least partial perfusion has been reported in human brain banking studies after postmortem intervals of several hours or days in some donors. Limitations of this review include substantial heterogeneity in study methods and outcome measures, which precluded formal meta-analysis. Future research may benefit from more thorough and precise measures of perfusion quality.

Indexed as

brain bankingcerebral perfusioncirculatory arrestischemiano-reflow phenomenonreperfusionresuscitation

Identifiers

PMID42651190
PMCPMC13510562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.