ReviewBrain sciences2026
Trigeminal Neuralgia in Multiple Sclerosis: A Critical Review of the Therapeutic Evidence and the Role of Cerebellopontine Angle Surgical Exploration.
Review in Brain sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTrigeminal neuralgia associated with multiple sclerosis (TN-MS) is a secondary facial pain syndrome whose clinical and therapeutic features differ substantially from those of classical TN. Although the literature comparing treatment outcomes between TN-MS and classical TN is relatively abundant, evidence on the impact of treatment on quality of life in TN-MS is scarce. In patients with MS-already vulnerable owing to the course of their disease and the burden of its treatments-therapeutic success cannot be defined by pain scales alone, because even modest analgesic improvement and, in particular, a reduction in medication burden may represent meaningful gains. This review aims to reappraise the therapeutic goals in TN-MS.
methodsWe provide a critical narrative review of the evidence, explicitly distinguishing direct evidence from indirect evidence extrapolated from the MS and classical-TN literature, across medical therapy, percutaneous procedures, stereotactic radiosurgery, and microvascular decompression (MVD).
resultsFirst-line pharmacotherapy remains standard but is largely extrapolated from classical TN, and tolerability is frequently limited by sedative and motor adverse effects in already polymedicated patients. Percutaneous procedures and radiosurgery provide clinically meaningful relief in selected patients, but recurrence is common and patient-centered outcomes are poorly documented. Surgical exploration of the cerebellopontine angle-including MVD, neurolysis, and combined techniques-should not be categorically excluded on the basis of an MS diagnosis in carefully selected patients, although outcomes are generally less favorable than in classical TN and the direct evidence is limited and vulnerable to selection bias.
conclusionsFuture studies should assess treatment impact on additional outcomes such as medication burden, quality of life, fatigue, cognition, and functional status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.