ArticleBrain sciences2026
Effects of a Dual Task of Exercise and Inhibitory Training on Cognitive Control Toward Food Cues and Frontal EEG Activity.
Article in Brain sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesThis study aimed to examine the acute effects of a dual-task intervention combining moderate-intensity cycling with a food-related Go/No-Go task on inhibitory control, subjective appetite, and frontal electroencephalogram (EEG) activity in healthy adults.
methodsForty healthy adults were randomly assigned to an experimental group or a control group in a single-blind design. The experimental group performed cycling combined with a food-related Go/No-Go task, whereas the control group performed only the cognitive task. Outcomes were assessed before and after the intervention, and Group × Time effects were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA with correction for multiple comparisons.
resultsNo significant Group × Time interactions were observed for the primary outcomes, including EEG alpha and theta power (ηp
conclusionsIn this single-session study, the intervention did not demonstrate clear intervention-specific benefits across the cognitive, EEG, or eating-related outcomes. Nevertheless, the contrasting descriptive pattern in subjective appetite warrants further investigation in larger studies involving repeated interventions and clinical populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.