Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42651132›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2026

Beyond 'Baby Brain': Memory and Sleep Health During Pregnancy-A Biopsychosocial Perspective.

Elisabetta Baldi, Johanna Gfüllner, Debora Meneo, Silvia Cerolini, Kerstin Hödlmoser, Chiara Baglioni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elisabetta BaldiDepartment of Human Sciences, Guglielmo Marconi University, 00193 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0009-0008-5767-8636
Johanna GfüllnerLaboratory for Sleep, Cognition and Consciousness Research, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience (CCNS), Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0009-0001-4702-1437
Debora MeneoDepartment of Human Sciences, Guglielmo Marconi University, 00193 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1415-3388
Silvia CeroliniDepartment of Human Sciences, Guglielmo Marconi University, 00193 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1447-7347
Kerstin HödlmoserLaboratory for Sleep, Cognition and Consciousness Research, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience (CCNS), Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Chiara BaglioniDepartment of Human Sciences, Guglielmo Marconi University, 00193 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3150-7755

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Across the course of pregnancy, women undergo profound biological, psychological, and social changes, often accompanied by subjective memory complaints. However, evidence for objective memory problems remains inconsistent, revealing a gap between subjective and objective impairment. This narrative review aimed to (a) provide an overview of memory difficulties during pregnancy, with particular attention to the potential biological and psychosocial mechanisms underlying them, and (b) examine sleep health as a specific and potentially modifiable factor within this framework, adopting a multidimensional perspective. Findings indicate that pregnant women frequently report subjective memory difficulties, whereas objective impairment is generally subtle, domain-specific, and remains within normative ranges. Biological evidence suggests substantial hormonal fluctuations and dynamic brain reorganisation during pregnancy; however, consistent associations with memory decline have not been established, and some studies point to adaptive neuroplastic processes. At the same time, societal expectations and environmental factors may influence subjective memory functioning, contributing to the discrepancy between subjective and objective findings. Sleep is consistently compromised during pregnancy and plays a key role in memory processes. However, evidence linking sleep and memory during pregnancy is limited and heterogeneous, with predominantly correlational findings across different dimensions of sleep health. These results support the need for a biopsychosocial framework that incorporates a multidimensional conceptualisation of sleep and for overcoming simplified views of pregnancy psychophysiological processes. Future research should adopt longitudinal and multimodal approaches to clarify the role of sleep health and its interaction with biological and psychosocial factors, ultimately informing preventive strategies and more comprehensive models of maternal memory functioning.

Indexed as

biological factorsmemorypregnancypsychosocial factorssleep health

Identifiers

PMID42651132
PMCPMC13510741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.