ReviewBrain sciences2026
Neuromodulation to Promote Recovery Following Traumatic Brain Injury: A Narrative Review of Current Pharmacologic and Non-Pharmacologic Approaches.
Review in Brain sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of long-term neurological disability worldwide and is frequently associated with persistent impairments in consciousness, cognition, mood, and functional independence. Despite advances in acute neurocritical care, effective therapies that enhance neurological recovery remain limited. Neuromodulation has emerged as a promising strategy to augment neuroplasticity and improve recovery through both pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic approaches. This narrative review summarizes current evidence supporting pharmacologic neuromodulatory therapies, including central nervous system stimulants (methylphenidate and modafinil), dopaminergic agents (amantadine and bromocriptine), acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil and rivastigmine), and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (sertraline and fluoxetine). Mechanisms of action, clinical efficacy, adverse effects, and practical considerations across the acute, subacute, and chronic phases of TBI recovery are discussed. Emerging non-pharmacologic neuromodulation techniques, including repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, electroconvulsive therapy, vagus nerve stimulation, and deep brain stimulation, are also reviewed. Although amantadine remains the only neuromodulator supported by moderate-quality guideline recommendations for accelerating recovery in disorders of consciousness, accumulating evidence suggests that several additional pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic neuromodulation interventions may improve attention, executive function, fatigue, mood, and rehabilitation participation in carefully selected patients. However, current evidence is limited by heterogeneous study populations, small sample sizes, inconsistent outcome measures, and a paucity of long-term randomized controlled trials. Future research should prioritize adequately powered comparative studies, standardized outcome measures, biomarker-guided patient selection, and multimodal treatment strategies to optimize neurological recovery following TBI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.