ArticleBrain sciences2026
An Augmented Reality and AI-Based System for Contextual Appliance Guidance: Implications for Cognitive Accessibility and Assistive Interaction.
Article in Brain sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundModern household appliances often present complex interfaces that can be difficult to use, especially for older adults, people with visual impairments, and users with mild cognitive difficulties. In such cases, interacting with appliances may require sustained attention, visuospatial search, working memory, and sequential action planning, while traditional user manuals often provide limited contextual support.
methodsTo address this issue, this study presents a proof-of-concept augmented reality (AR) and artificial intelligence (AI)-based system for contextual appliance guidance. The proposed architecture integrates visual sensing, deep learning, and large language models to detect appliance controls, interpret user queries, retrieve relevant information from user manuals, and provide step-by-step guidance directly on the real interface. A YOLOv8 model trained on a custom dataset was used for button detection, YOLO-Seg was employed to enhance visual highlighting through segmentation, and BoT-SORT was used to maintain detection consistency across frames. A Unity-based mobile application displayed real-time AR overlays with customizable visual settings for accessibility needs, such as low vision and color blindness that may be relevant for future accessibility-oriented applications. In addition to its technical pipeline, the system is conceptually relevant as a potential form of external cognitive support because it transforms static manual instructions into situated, sequential, and visually grounded guidance.
resultsExperimental results showed promising technical performance for button detection and segmentation, while a preliminary user evaluation in a non-clinical sample suggested good usability, clarity, and acceptability of the interface.
conclusionsThese findings support the technical feasibility and preliminary usability of the approach, while cognitive workload, confidence, functional autonomy, and clinical benefit were not directly measured. Targeted validation in older adults, people with visual impairments, and clinical populations is therefore still needed. Future developments will include multimodal feedback, read-aloud guidance, and more specific evaluation of workload, confidence, and functional autonomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.