Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42651093›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2026

A Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Classification of Parkinson's Disease During a Working Memory and Sustained Attention Task.

Mercedes A Terry, Samuel A Birkholz, Jeffrey S Johnson, Jau-Shin Lou, Asenath X A Huether, Jessica Keller, Enrique Alvarez-Vazquez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mercedes A TerryBiomedical Engineering Department, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-4456-8113
Samuel A BirkholzDepartment of Psychology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-6749-265X
Jeffrey S JohnsonDepartment of Psychology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, USA.
Jau-Shin LouDepartment of Neurology, Sanford Health, Fargo, ND 58103, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5631-1594
Asenath X A HuetherDepartment of Psychology, Minnesota State Community and Technical College, Moorhead, MN 56560, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3552-195X
Jessica KellerDepartment of Neurology, Sanford Health, Fargo, ND 58103, USA.
Enrique Alvarez-VazquezBiomedical Engineering Department, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7257-0817

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesIndividuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) experience deficits in working memory (WM) and sustained attention (ATTN), but diagnosing and monitoring these deficits remains challenging. This study compares machine learning (ML) classification models trained on EEG and pupillometry data from WM and ATTN tasks to identify task-specific and shared cognitive biomarkers of PD.

methodsEEG and pupillometry were recorded from PD patients and healthy controls (HC) during a visual change detection WM task and a continuous performance ATTN task. A standardized toolbox extracted 108 features, reduced via PCA and recursive elimination (RE) and classified using an SVM-RBF within a nested, 5-fold cross-validated pipeline, with class balancing (SMOTE) and feature selection performed strictly within training folds to prevent leakage.

resultsOn internal test folds, WM achieved 71% accuracy (F1 = 0.701) and ATTN achieved 73% (F1 = 0.699); on an independent hold-out set, WM achieved 63% accuracy (F1 = 0.626) and ATTN achieved 70% (F1 = 0.623). ATTN showed higher accuracy and precision, WM showed higher recall, and univariate analyses independently supported several top-ranked features (e.g., theta/beta and alpha/theta ratios); PAI and FAA, though top features in both tasks, reached univariate significance only in ATTN. These results indicate WM and ATTN yield complementary, task-linked neurophysiological signatures relevant to PD classification.

conclusionAt its current stage, this pipeline functions as a research tool for biomarker discovery rather than a clinical diagnostic, though larger, externally validated samples could support future screening and monitoring applications.

Indexed as

cognitive biomarkerselectroencephalography (EEG)machine learningmultimodal classificationParkinson’s diseasepupillometryradial basis function support vector machine (SVM-RBF)sustained attentiontask-based biomarkersworking memory

Identifiers

PMID42651093
PMCPMC13510374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.