Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42650988›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Perianal Fistulae Medical Imaging Maps: A Pictorial Diagnostic Review.

Sultan Abdulwadoud Alshoabi, Abdulkhaleq Ayedh Binnuhaid, Abdullatif O Magram, Abdullgabbar M Hamid, Fahad H Alhazmi, Abdulkareem Algahtani, Bashair Alhummiany, Kamal D Alsultan, Alaa Alshoabi, Rahaf Hamid and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Sultan Abdulwadoud AlshoabiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University, Al-Madinah 42353, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-5049-6989
Abdulkhaleq Ayedh BinnuhaidDepartment of Specialized Surgery, Radiology Section, Faculty of Medicine, Hadhramout University, Hadhramaut P.O.B. 8892, Yemen.ORCID 0009-0007-4621-2825
Abdullatif O MagramAdvanced AlRazi Diagnostic Center, Al-Hodeidah, Yemen.
Abdullgabbar M HamidRadiology Department, Rush University Medical Group, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6868-5294
Fahad H AlhazmiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University, Al-Madinah 42353, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-8196-3233
Abdulkareem AlgahtaniDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University, Al-Madinah 42353, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0007-8475-7367
Bashair AlhummianyDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University, Al-Madinah 42353, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-1891-1721
Kamal D AlsultanDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University, Al-Madinah 42353, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-2982-2935
Alaa AlshoabiApplied College, Taibah University, Al-Madinah 42353, Saudi Arabia.
Rahaf HamidBiology Major, Dominican University, 7900 West Division Street, River Forest, IL 60305, USA.
Awatif M OmerDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University, Al-Madinah 42353, Saudi Arabia.
Mahmoud S BabikerDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University, Al-Madinah 42353, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-5996-0888
Amel F AlzainDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University, Al-Madinah 42353, Saudi Arabia.
Fathelrehman A ElajabDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University, Al-Madinah 42353, Saudi Arabia.
Khaled Mohammed Al-SayaghiDepartment of Medical Surgical Nursing, College of Nursing, Taibah University, Al-Madinah 42353, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9508-3050

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perianal fistula, or anal fistula, is an abnormal granulomatous tract connecting the anal canal or rectum to the surrounding skin. It causes perianal pain and fistulous discharge, negatively impacting patients' quality of life. The mechanism underlying fistula formation remains incompletely understood. Medical imaging is essential for accurate preoperative assessment of the shape, number and branching of fistulous tracts, identification of internal openings and Parks' classification. This pictorial review provides an image-based overview of the key medical imaging concepts essential for the diagnosis of perianal fistulae and summarises the roles, advantages and limitations of the available imaging modalities for evaluating perianal fistulae. The current evidence on X-ray fistulography, computed tomography (CT) fistulography, transcutaneous ultrasonography (TCUS), endoanal ultrasonography (EAUS) and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was reviewed, emphasising on their diagnostic performance and clinical applications. Conventional X-ray fistulography has progressively been abandoned because it is invasive, is uncomfortable for patients, provides poor soft tissue contrast and inadequately visualises anal sphincters, complex fistulous tracts, secondary branches and abscesses. CT fistulography is useful for evaluating perianal abscesses and fistula when MRI and EAUS are unavailable. TCUS is widely available, non-invasive and radiation-free but is operator-dependent and has limited ability to evaluate high perianal fistulae. EAUS accurately evaluates fistulous tracts, can be performed at the bedside or intraoperatively and is reliable when MRI is contraindicated. However, EAUS is operator-dependent, is contraindicated in patients with severe anal stenosis or acute anal pain, and has a small field of view. Pelvic MRI is the gold standard, providing excellent visualisation of anal canal anatomy, superior soft tissue contrast, accurate mapping of fistulous tracts, localisation of internal openings, assessment of the involvement of anal sphincters and detection of secondary tracts, abscesses and associated complications. Consequently, MRI is a preferred imaging modality, which can guide treatment decisions and monitoring of treatment response.

Indexed as

external opening (EO)fistulous tractinternal opening (IO)pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)perianal fistulatranscutaneous ultrasound imaging (TCUS)

Identifiers

PMID42650988
PMCPMC13512459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.