ReviewBiomolecules2026
Mechanobiology of Matricellular Proteins in Bladder Cancer: A Narrative Review and Bioinformatics Analysis.
Review in Biomolecules, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The extracellular matrix (ECM) in cancer differs from healthy tissue in structure, composition, and mechanical properties. Matricellular proteins (MCPs) play important roles in shaping ECM architecture during tissue remodeling. This narrative review, combined with a bioinformatics analysis, examines six major MCP families-Fasciclins, Tenascins, Thrombospondins, Small Leucine-Rich Proteoglycans, the SPARC family, and the CCN family-through a mechanobiological lens in bladder cancer. It summarizes current knowledge on the mechanical regulation of MCP expression, their effects on matrix stiffness, and their contributions to bladder cancer progression. Analyses of public datasets reveal that stromal cells are the predominant source of MCPs in the tumor microenvironment. Furthermore, mechanical upregulation and involvement in the formation of stiff ECM highlight MCPs as important players in a mechanotransduction feedback loop. While most MCPs exert pro-tumorigenic effects on bladder cancer cells, several display context-dependent or anti-tumorigenic activities. Existing studies have primarily focused on the isolated effects of MCPs on bladder cancer cell lines in two-dimensional systems or simple subcutaneous xenograft models. Both approaches fail to capture the context-dependent nature of MCPs and their involvement in ECM formation. These findings underscore the need for future studies to investigate the complex effects of MCPs on bladder cancer progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.