ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Molecular Characterization of the
Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesZoonotic tuberculosis (TB) remains a persistent public health challenge worldwide. It is particularly common in settings with close human-livestock-environment interactions. In Tanzania, progress toward TB control is increasingly threatened by multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), yet genomic data from regions characterized by pastoralist and mining activities remain scarce. This study employed whole-genome sequencing (WGS) to characterize
methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted between September 2024 and February 2025. A total of 178 presumptive human TB cases provided sputum samples. From cattle, 161 samples were collected (110 milk samples and 51 lymph node aspirates), with each animal contributing only one type of sample. Specimen were analyzed using GeneXpert MTB/RIF, Lowenstein-Jensen culture, and WGS. Phylogenetic reconstruction was performed using SNP-based methods and IQ-TREE2 version 2.2.0.
resultsAmong human participants, 14 (7.8%) sputum samples were GeneXpert positive and were confirmed as members of MTBC by LJ culture. In cattle, one (0.62%) lymph node aspirate was positive for MTBC. Significant predictors of MTBC positivity included previous TB history, weight loss, and occupation involving mining and cattle keeping. WGS of five human isolates identified Lineages 1, 3, and 4. One isolate (Sample 98) harbored mutations associated with XDR-TB.
conclusionsWGS revealed
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.