ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Corporate Resonance of Food Safety Risk: A Space-Time Perspective.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Employing a space-time perspective, this study develops a CA-SHIRS model of corporate resonance diffusion of food safety risk, drawing on complex network theory and cellular automata theory. The study then examines the mechanisms and spatial-temporal evolution characteristics of this diffusion, considering the interplay among food firm heterogeneity, media communication strategy, and government regulatory strategy. The study reaches the following conclusions: (1) Higher probabilities of infection, conversion, and immune failure speed up risk transmission within the spatial-temporal association network of food firms. By contrast, raising the immune probability and direct immune probability helps contain the scale of risk spread. (2) The intensity of corporate resonance diffusion is positively correlated with corporate influence and media influence, and negatively correlated with corporate social responsibility, media information disclosure intensity, government penalty intensity, and government regulatory information transparency. It exhibits an inverted U-shaped relationship with corporate risk preference and a positive U-shaped relationship with media reporting preference. (3) Both corporate influence and media influence reinforce corporate resonance diffusion, while government regulation effectively mitigates it. Firms with moderate risk preference are most significantly affected by extreme media coverage; corporate social responsibility and media information disclosure intensity can jointly suppress diffusion at these nodes. Government regulation exerts a stronger inhibitory effect on corporate resonance diffusion than the amplifying effect exerted by media communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.