Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42650624›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Perceptions of Produce Recall Responsibility and Compliance of FSMA Produce Safety Rule Among Small- and Medium-Sized Produce Growers.

Elma Kontor-Manu, Yaohua Feng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elma Kontor-ManuDepartment of Food Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47906, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-8432-3540
Yaohua FengDepartment of Food Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47906, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3012-1930

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2021-68006-33893
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensuring the safety of produce is essential for protecting consumers and preventing foodborne illnesses. Regulatory frameworks, such as the Food Safety Modernization Act's Produce Safety Rule (FSMA PSR), contribute to the decision-making process of produce growers in ensuring the production of safe foods. However, little research has explored the role of growers' perceptions of responsibility for produce-associated outbreaks, and how these may influence their decisions. Using a cross-sectional online survey of 500 US small- or medium-sized produce growers, this study examined perceptions of stakeholder responsibility for two produce-related outbreaks involving jalapeños and a spinach-spring mix blend. The implications of the PSR exemptions were also investigated. Responsibility attribution differed among stakeholder groups for each produce commodity. Packing houses were identified as a common denominator responsible for both produce commodities. Medium-sized produce growers agreed that the PSR exemptions provide direct market access and reduced time commitment to exempted farms (

Indexed as

foodborne illnessesoutbreak responsibilitypacking housesproduce growersproduce outbreakproduce safetyProduce Safety Rulesmall- and medium-size farms

Identifiers

PMID42650624
PMCPMC13512611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.