ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Understanding Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modified Foods: A Theory of Planned Behavior-Brand Equity-Sociodemographic Interactions.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines consumer acceptance of genetically modified foods (GMFs) by integrating the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), brand equity dimensions, and sociodemographic factors within a configurational framework. Drawing on a sample of 405 Spanish consumers, the research combines correlational analysis with fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to identify the causal paths leading to both purchase intention and purchase non-intention. The findings show that the traditional TPB constructs and brand equity dimensions are positively associated with purchase intention, whereas belonging to older generations is negatively associated with it. However, the configurational analysis reveals a more nuanced picture. Purchase intention is explained by four configurations, grouped into two main profiles: one based on favorable subjective norms among younger consumers, and another centered on the joint presence of brand trust and brand familiarity. In contrast, purchase non-intention is explained by seven configurations, mainly characterized by the absence of favorable TPB conditions and weak brand equity, especially lack of trust and familiarity. The results confirm the causal asymmetry between acceptance and rejection of GMFs, as the configurations leading to purchase intention are not the mirror image of those leading to purchase non-intention. These findings challenge the assumption that GMF acceptance and rejection are symmetrical phenomena, and demonstrate that brand trust and familiarity complement attitudinal factors and constitute relevant conditions in several configurations associated with purchase intention. From a managerial and policy perspective, the findings suggest that promoting GMFs' acceptance requires not only improving attitudes and perceived social approval, but also fostering trustworthy and familiar brand environments that may contribute to reducing uncertainty, alongside credible scientific information and effective institutional oversight.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.