ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A High-Performance Fe@N-S-O-C Nanocomposite-Based Electrochemical Sensor for Dopamine Detection in Pork Samples.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Monitoring dopamine (DA) in pork can provide useful information for assessing meat freshness and quality deterioration. In this work, an Fe@N-S-O-C nanocomposite was fabricated as an electrode modifier for DA determination. The Fe@N-S-O-C nanocomposite was synthesized via precipitation followed by calcination using melamine and ferrous sulfate as precursors. The crystal structure, surface chemical composition, and morphology were characterized by XRD, XPS, SEM, and TEM. The Fe@N-S-O-C-modified glassy carbon electrode (Fe@N-S-O-C/GCE) was then evaluated for its electrocatalytic performance toward DA. Under the optimized conditions (pH 6.0), the sensor showed linear responses to DA over 1-65 and 65-220 μM. The sensitivities for these two ranges were 4.357 and 1.685 μA μM
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.