ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Effects of Viscosity Modification on Sensory Perception, Hedonic Evaluation, and Expected Fullness of Whey-Based High-Protein Beverages Under Blind and Informed Conditions.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of xanthan-gum-induced viscosity on sensory perception, expected fullness, and panelists' acceptance of whey-based high-protein beverages under sequential blind and informed evaluation conditions. Four formulations containing 0%, 0.08%, 0.12%, and 0.16% xanthan gum were evaluated by 131 panelists using 30 mL tasting samples. Linear Mixed Models (LMMs) were applied to account for repeated measurements and inter-individual variability. Increasing viscosity systematically increased expected fullness while reducing overall liking and prospective hypothetical consumption volume. Panelists showed higher acceptance and greater prospective hypothetical consumption volume during the informed evaluation condition, although these differences were interpreted cautiously because the evaluation conditions were administered sequentially. Nevertheless, higher viscosity remained associated with lower hedonic ratings, indicating that oral texture continued to play a dominant role in product acceptance regardless of information disclosure. Taste liking was the strongest predictor of overall acceptance, whereas perceived viscosity was associated with lower prospective hypothetical consumption volume, particularly at higher xanthan gum concentrations. These findings highlight the importance of immediate sensory attributes, particularly taste and viscosity-related expected fullness, in shaping panelists' acceptance and prospective hypothetical consumption volume. Differences between the sequential blind and informed evaluations, however, were interpreted cautiously because they may also reflect session-order and repeated-exposure effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.