ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Nutritional and Functional Fortification of Cultivated Meat: A Scoping Review.
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the ever-growing population and increasing demand for food, cultivated meat (CM) represents a potentially sustainable alternative source of protein. However, one of the critical challenges is ensuring that the nutritional value of CM is comparable to that of conventional meat. In light of this, this scoping review aimed to systematically map the existing evidence from in vitro studies and identify potential nutritional fortification methods for CM. Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from inception to December 2025, supplemented by a hand search in January 2026. Studies were included if they were in vitro studies related to cultivated food that applied a fortification strategy or treatment to improve the nutritional value or food functionality and reported the relevant outcomes. Extracted data (e.g., fortification methods, cell lines, study results) were synthesized descriptively. Seven studies were eligible for inclusion. Three fortification strategies were identified, including metabolic engineering, product reformulation, and nutrient-enriched cell culture medium. Reported outcomes varied among the included studies and included changes in nutritional value, food functionality, and cellular functionality of CM. However, most studies used cell models that are primarily intended for research purposes rather than food production or human consumption, which may limit their relevance to commercial CM products. In conclusion, this review identified preliminary fortification approaches that may modify the nutritional value, food functionality, or cellular functionality of CM. However, further investigation is needed to determine their effects on the nutritional composition of the resulting cell biomass or final CM product.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.