Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42650534›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Nutritional and Functional Fortification of Cultivated Meat: A Scoping Review.

Cheuk Lun Wong, Xinyue Liu, Jing Guo, Federica Cheli, Carlotta Giromini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cheuk Lun WongDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (DIVAS), Università degli Studi di Milano, Via dell'Università 6, 29600 Lodi, Italy.ORCID 0009-0005-3998-6625
Xinyue LiuSchool of Food Science and Nutrition, Faculty of Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID 0009-0006-4277-9149
Jing GuoSchool of Food Science and Nutrition, Faculty of Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Federica CheliDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (DIVAS), Università degli Studi di Milano, Via dell'Università 6, 29600 Lodi, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2682-8685
Carlotta GirominiDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (DIVAS), Università degli Studi di Milano, Via dell'Università 6, 29600 Lodi, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3717-5336

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the ever-growing population and increasing demand for food, cultivated meat (CM) represents a potentially sustainable alternative source of protein. However, one of the critical challenges is ensuring that the nutritional value of CM is comparable to that of conventional meat. In light of this, this scoping review aimed to systematically map the existing evidence from in vitro studies and identify potential nutritional fortification methods for CM. Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from inception to December 2025, supplemented by a hand search in January 2026. Studies were included if they were in vitro studies related to cultivated food that applied a fortification strategy or treatment to improve the nutritional value or food functionality and reported the relevant outcomes. Extracted data (e.g., fortification methods, cell lines, study results) were synthesized descriptively. Seven studies were eligible for inclusion. Three fortification strategies were identified, including metabolic engineering, product reformulation, and nutrient-enriched cell culture medium. Reported outcomes varied among the included studies and included changes in nutritional value, food functionality, and cellular functionality of CM. However, most studies used cell models that are primarily intended for research purposes rather than food production or human consumption, which may limit their relevance to commercial CM products. In conclusion, this review identified preliminary fortification approaches that may modify the nutritional value, food functionality, or cellular functionality of CM. However, further investigation is needed to determine their effects on the nutritional composition of the resulting cell biomass or final CM product.

Indexed as

cell culturecellular agriculturecultivated meatfortificationnovel foodnutrients

Identifiers

PMID42650534
PMCPMC13512501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.