ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Comparative Analysis of Bioactive Compounds and Heavy Metal Content in Table Eggs from Various Housing Systems.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The growing demand for eggs from alternative housing systems is driven by perceived nutritional and welfare benefits. However, the trade-off between enhanced bioactive composition and exposure to environmental contaminants remains insufficiently explored. This study evaluated the physical traits, bioactive compounds, and heavy metal content of 480 commercially available table eggs from four housing systems: organic, free-range, barn, and enriched cages. Organic eggs exhibited the highest albumen quality, expressed by Haugh units (92.03 vs. 70.86 in cages) and lysozyme activity (144,877 U/mL vs. 119,830 U/mL in cages), alongside the highest concentrations of fat-soluble vitamins (e.g., vitamin A at 1600 μg/100 g and vitamin E at 3267 μg/100 g) and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, including docosahexaenoic acid (DHA: 0.673% vs. 0.360% in cages). Conversely, organic eggs presented the weakest eggshells (breaking strength of 34.19 N vs. 47.05 N in cages) and a less favourable lipid profile regarding atherogenicity (AI: 0.411) and thrombogenicity (TI: 3.455) indices. Crucially, organic eggs contained significantly higher levels of lead (0.361 mg/kg) compared to indoor systems (0.041 mg/kg in barn and 0.102 mg/kg in cages), highlighting their susceptibility to environmental pollution. Cage and barn eggs were associated with higher chemical safety and shell strength but demonstrated a lower overall bioactive value. Ultimately, the choice of table eggs may involve a trade-off between the health-promoting benefits of extensive systems and the potential risks of heavy metal contamination, emphasising the need for integrated food safety management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.