ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Enhancing Pediatric Pharmaceutical Care: Development and Evaluation of a Rectal Demonstration Model for Pediatric Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesInflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may require topical rectal treatment for distal colonic inflammation. Rectal foams or rectal enemas can reach deeper bowel sections but are complex to administer, especially for pediatric patients with IBD. Furthermore, it is a challenge to visualize this administration process in a structured manner. We aimed to design a rectal demonstration model to enable the visualization of rectal foam administration and to assess the clinical risk potentially associated with detectable errors.
methodsA rectal demonstration model was developed, handling errors were defined, and their clinical risk was rated. The model was tested for rectal foam administration by 19 adolescent patients (aged 12-18 years).
resultsA total of 12 observable administration steps, including their clinical risk, were defined by an expert panel of physicians and pharmacists. Seven handling errors were rated with a high clinical risk, such as "Not shaking the spray can at all before administration". In demonstrations by adolescent patients, a median of three (Q25/Q75; 2/4.5; min/max 1/7) handling errors were identified. The most frequent error was releasing the pump dome too quickly after pushing down (11/19, 58%). At least one error with high clinical risk (score: 5-6) was identified in 15/19 (79%) of patients' administrations.
conclusionsThe developed demonstration model facilitates the visualization of handling errors in rectal foam administration that would otherwise not be accessible in routine care. A high rate of clinically relevant handling errors was identified in adolescents. Prospectively, the model can be used to practice rectal foam administration and address patient handling errors to increase patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.