ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Outcomes of Low Vision Rehabilitation Programs for Children: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the visual, functional, educational, and mobility outcomes of a comprehensive pediatric low vision rehabilitation (LVR) program and determine whether electronic low vision aids (LVAs) provide additional benefit.
methodsA multicenter prospective observational cohort study was conducted across three tertiary low vision rehabilitation centers in Jordan. Two hundred children aged 6-16 years with moderate-to-severe visual impairment were enrolled. The intervention group (
resultsAt 12 months, the intervention group demonstrated significant improvement in distance VA from 0.87 ± 0.13 to 0.65 ± 0.11 LogMAR (mean change -0.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.25 to -0.19;
conclusionsComprehensive pediatric low vision rehabilitation improved visual, educational, and mobility outcomes. In an exploratory subgroup analysis, children using electronic low vision aids demonstrated greater functional improvement than those using non-electronic low vision aids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.