ReviewAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Growth Performance and Antioxidant Responses to Dietary Flavonoids in Swine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Exploratory Dose-Time Relationships.
Review in Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dietary flavonoids are increasingly investigated in swine nutrition, but how supplementation level, intervention duration, and growth stage are associated with growth and antioxidant responses remains unclear. This PRISMA 2020 systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated dietary flavonoid supplementation in pigs. Twenty-eight randomized controlled trials were synthesized using three-level random-effects models to account for dependent effect sizes. Flavonoid supplementation was associated with increased average daily gain (ADG; SMD = 0.719, 95% CI: 0.428 to 1.009; I2=51.85%) and a lower feed-to-gain ratio (F/G; SMD = -0.708, 95% CI: -0.929 to -0.487; I2=32.25%), whereas the association with average daily feed intake (ADFI) was not statistically significant (SMD = 0.217, 95% CI: -0.101 to 0.535; I2=59.30%). Supplementation was also associated with increased superoxide dismutase (SMD = 0.907) and glutathione peroxidase activities (SMD = 0.666) and reduced malondialdehyde concentrations (SMD = -0.989), although heterogeneity was substantial for these outcomes (I2=96.47-97.83%). The certainty of evidence was assessed as low for ADG and moderate for ADFI, F/G, and antioxidant outcomes under the adapted GRADE framework. Exploratory stage-specific dose-time meta-regression identified potential relationships between supplementation intensity and ADG in weaned pigs (35 effect sizes from 14 studies) and finishing pigs (12 effect sizes from four studies). In finishing pigs, intervention duration was associated with growth responses. However, this subgroup contained few independent studies, and intervention duration covaried with age, physiological stage, flavonoid source, dose, health status, and basal diet. This association therefore does not establish an independent causal effect of intervention duration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.