ReviewAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Oxidative Stress and Male Infertility: A Critical Analysis of Current Diagnostic and Therapeutic Methods.
Review in Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Male infertility affects a substantial proportion of couples worldwide, with oxidative stress recognized as one of its most prevalent and potentially treatable mechanisms. This review critically analyzes current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for oxidative stress-related male infertility, highlighting the necessity of advancing from descriptive semen analysis to mechanism-based clinical care. The biological basis of reactive oxygen species generation in spermatozoa, the dual physiological and pathological roles of redox signaling, and the contributions of leukocytes, lifestyle factors, infections, varicocele, metabolic disease, environmental exposures, and transition metals in amplifying oxidative injury are examined. Laboratory methods for assessing oxidative stress, including chemiluminescence, flow cytometry, oxidation-reduction potential, and total antioxidant capacity assays, are evaluated with respect to biological relevance, technical limitations, standardization, and clinical applicability. Evidence suggests that indiscriminate antioxidant use, without prior confirmation of oxidative stress or identification of its cause, may account for inconsistent clinical trial outcomes and could induce reductive stress. Conversely, individualized management based on comprehensive andrological evaluation, treatment of underlying conditions, and quality-controlled functional sperm testing is more rational and potentially effective. Oxidative stress should therefore be regarded as a diagnosable and monitorable clinical entity in male infertility, necessitating validated diagnostics and personalized therapeutic strategies rather than empiric supplementation alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.