ReviewGenes2026
Epigenetic Skeletal Muscle Memory: The Impact of Physical Activity on Aging and Post-Injury Regeneration.
Review in Genes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skeletal muscle retains adaptive information from previous mechanical loading, enabling faster responses to subsequent training and regenerative challenges. This review synthesizes current evidence on the cellular and epigenetic mechanisms underlying skeletal muscle memory and examines how these mechanisms are modified by aging and post-injury regeneration. Muscle memory emerges from complementary structural and molecular components, including myonuclear retention, persistent DNA methylation changes, chromatin remodeling, transcriptional priming, non-coding RNA regulation, and mitochondrial epigenetic adaptations. These mechanisms interact with muscle satellite cells (MuSCs), fibro-adipogenic progenitors (FAPs), immune cells, and extracellular matrix remodeling to maintain regenerative competence. During aging, epigenetic drift, chronic low-grade inflammation, altered macrophage states, MuSC dysfunction, persistent FAP activity, fibrosis, mitochondrial impairment, and anabolic resistance progressively reduce this plasticity, thereby contributing to sarcopenia. Training-detraining-retraining studies indicate that parts of the exercise-induced epigenetic landscape remain detectable after training cessation and can be reactivated during renewed loading, although the persistence and functional importance of individual molecular signatures remain incompletely defined. Physical exercise remains the most established intervention for preserving muscle function and epigenetic responsiveness, whereas caloric restriction, modulation of nutrient-sensing pathways, senolytic strategies, and direct targeting of epigenetic regulators remain promising but translationally less mature approaches. Overall, the preservation of epigenetic plasticity may be a key determinant of healthy skeletal muscle aging and effective regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.