ArticleGenes2026
Cytogenetic Characterization of the Yak (
Article in Genes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesThe domestic yak (
resultsGTG-, RBG-, RBA- and CBA-banding confirmed the yak diploid number as 2n = 60 and the fundamental number as NF = 62, with banding patterns highly comparable to the standardized cattle karyotype. CBA-banding showed an X chromosome lacking evident constitutive heterochromatin and a Y chromosome with distal C-positive blocks. Chromosome instability was low, with 3.75% abnormal metaphases, mainly represented by chromatid and iso-chromatid breaks, while the mean sister chromatid exchange (SCE) rate was 5.19 ± 2.14 per cell. Sequential Ag-NOR/RBA staining localized nucleolar organizer regions (NORs) at the telomeres of autosomes 2, 3, 4, 11 and 25, as in cattle. Zoo-FISH using bovine chromosome paints for X, Y, 5 and 15 showed complete hybridization to the corresponding yak chromosomes, and BAC-FISH mapped the Y-linked
conclusionsOverall, at the resolution tested, these findings support broad macrostructural conservation of yak and cattle karyotypes and provide cytogenetic reference data for yak populations reared outside of their traditional range. The persistence of F1 male sterility despite this large-scale chromosomal conservation suggests that fine-scale sex chromosome differences, particularly involving pseudoautosomal regions, recombination boundaries, or heterochromatin organization, may deserve targeted investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.