ArticleGenes2026
Shared Genetic Architecture Between Epigenetic Aging and Musculoskeletal Diseases.
Article in Genes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe directional relationship between epigenetic age acceleration (EAA) and musculoskeletal disease remains unresolved. This study integrated bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) with multi-layer genomic evidence to evaluate directionality, shared genetic architecture, and robustness to instrument definition.
methodsFour EAA clocks (IEAA, PhenoAA, HannumAA, and GrimAA) and ten musculoskeletal phenotypes were analyzed in a 10 × 4 bidirectional two-sample MR design. EAA instruments underwent GRCh37 functional annotation, genome-wide-significant external-association screening for the index variants and European linkage-disequilibrium proxies, pair-specific Steiger filtering, and conservative Set A/B/C sensitivity analyses. The juvenile-arthritis reverse models underwent instrument-flow reconstruction, strength assessment, liability-scale directionality testing, and minimum-detectable-effect analysis. Additional analyses comprised LD score regression (LDSC), PLACO+ cross-trait locus mapping, Bayesian colocalization, multivariable MR (MVMR) with exact-SNP matched univariable comparators, and integrated evidence synthesis.
resultsForward MR yielded two nominal HannumAA associations. The inverse HannumAA-spondyloarthritis estimate remained directionally consistent across the original, Steiger-filtered, and conservative external-association-filtered sets, whereas the HannumAA-pain-in-thoracic-spine estimate lost nominal significance in the conservative set; no forward result survived correction across 40 tests. GrimAA forward estimates were sensitive to use of the fallback instrument threshold. Reverse MR identified ten nominal associations. For juvenile arthritis, three harmonized instruments had
conclusionsThe results support a prioritized genomic map with substantial instrument- and model-specific uncertainty. Disease-to-clock signals were richer than clock-to-disease signals, GrimAA shared polygenic architecture with osteoarthritis, and selected loci showed strong shared-variant evidence, while the MR and MVMR findings remained unsuitable for definitive causal or mediation claims.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.