ReviewCancers2026
B Cell Aplasia Following CAR T Cell Therapy: Incidence, Kinetics, Prognostic Implications, and Clinical Management.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
B cell aplasia (BCA), the sustained depletion of circulating CD19-positive B cells, is the defining on-target, off-tumor consequence of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy. Despite its occurrence across all approved CAR T cell products and all responding patients, BCA has not been systematically reviewed as a standalone clinical and biological phenomenon. This review synthesizes data from landmark trials and real-world cohorts across B cell-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), large B cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia to characterize BCA incidence, recovery kinetics, prognostic significance, and management implications. Anti-BCMA products, which mechanism of action differs fundamentally, depleting plasma cells rather than B cell precursors, are intentionally excluded from this review. BCA is observed in all responders and is consistently absent in non-responders across reported cohorts , making it a reliable pharmacodynamic marker of CAR T cell activity. Its prognostic significance is disease-specific: in lymphoma, BCA recovery does not predict relapse and durable remission is achievable independent of sustained aplasia; in B-ALL, early BCA recovery within six months is a robust independent predictor of CD19-positive relapse, while persistent BCA correlates with sustained remission. CD19-negative antigen-escape relapse occurs preferentially in the presence of intact BCA and high pre-infusion tumor burden. Combining BCA kinetics with bone marrow next-generation sequencing minimal residual disease assessment at day 28 and month 3 constitutes the most powerful post-infusion risk-stratification framework currently available. BCA is mechanistically dissociated from hypogammaglobulinemia: IgM declines rapidly and profoundly, IgA more slowly, while IgG-maintained by CD19-negative long-lived plasma cells-is the most preserved isotype. No B cell count threshold below which hypogammaglobulinemia becomes clinically significant has been established. Evidence-informed IVIG replacement thresholds are proposed, though no randomized trial data exist to support them, representing a critical gap requiring prospective investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.