ReviewCancers2026
Surgical Management of Recurrent Brain Metastases: A Review.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As survival for cancer patients improves, the incidence of brain metastases has risen. This is likely due to improved systemic disease control, increased diligence in surveillance imaging in high-risk pathologies, improved neuro-imaging techniques and increased systemic screening for clinical trial enrollment. While there are well-established treatments for brain metastases, many patients will experience recurrence after definitive treatment. The management of these recurrent lesions is not well established and often varies on a per-patient basis, owing to the clinical complexity and variety of these patients. Patients with recurrent brain metastases have surgical procedural options to achieve local tumor control, including laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) repeat open surgical resection with or without placement of intracavity brachytherapy. Repeat resection can offer rapid improvement in neurological symptoms, performance status, and potentially survival. LITT is less invasive than a standard craniotomy but offers a chance at directed local treatment while still obtaining tissue for diagnostic purposes and achieving acceptable survival outcomes. Further study is needed to determine the role of LITT for recurrent brain metastases, but it is a useful tool, particularly for patients with deep-seated lesions who may not tolerate a large surgery. Intracavitary brachytherapy allows for the immediate delivery of highly conformal radiation to the surgical bed with excellent local control and low rates of radiation necrosis, even in previously irradiated patients. The decision regarding which of the above to employ for recurrent brain metastases will vary on a case-by-case basis, and further studies are needed to standardize their use for this growing problem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.