ReviewCancers2026
Intraoperative Techniques Aiding Margin Assessment and Nerve Sparing During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) requires a balance between complete cancer excision and preservation of urinary continence and erectile function. Because the preservation of neurovascular bundles adjacent to the prostate surface contributes to postoperative functional recovery, intraoperative margin assessment and surgeon-guidance technologies may help refine resection and support individualized nerve-sparing decision-making. Neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination remains the most studied and clinically established method, with evidence supporting reduced positive surgical margins and broader nerve preservation, but its use is limited by cost, workflow complexity, and pathology infrastructure. Fluorescence confocal microscopy is promising but remains limited by short and apical margins; its improved accuracy for longer margins raises concerns about its reliability for routine intraoperative margin assessment. Other optical, spectroscopic, and prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted molecular margin assessment techniques have demonstrated inconsistent diagnostic performance, with particularly low sensitivity for assessment approaches remain investigational, whereas intraoperative ultrasound, three-dimensional and augmented-reality models, fluorescence guidance, and image-enhancement systems should be viewed as surgical guidance tools rather than direct margin-assessment methods. Intraoperative technologies may improve surgical decision-making during RARP, but prospective multicenter studies with standardized oncological and functional endpoints are needed before broader adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.