ArticleCancers2026
Optimizing the Real-World Use of BCMA-Targeted T-Cell-Engaging Therapies in Patients with Triple-Class-Exposed Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: An Italian Modified Delphi Consensus.
Article in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesThe treatment landscape of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) has significantly evolved with the introduction of novel classes of agents and, more recently, of T-cell-redirecting therapies, including bispecific antibodies (BsAbs). It is essential to enhance and harmonize the therapeutic management of BsAbs within clinical practice.
methodsWe performed a modified Delphi expert consensus study on the use of BsAbs targeting the B-Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA) in patients with triple-class-exposed (TCE) RRMM. The study was conducted in April-November 2025 following established guidelines and best practices for defining consensus. The key phases in the use of anti-BCMA BsAbs were identified and explored.
resultsFifteen Italian hematologists with expertise in the care of TCE RRMM completed two Delphi rounds. Agreement (defined as ≥67% of panelists) was achieved on most of the topics evaluated. In particular, all panelists considered the step-up dosing phase feasible in an outpatient setting, under specific circumstances, and dosing de-escalation in responding patients to reduce the risk of adverse events. For most of them, anti-BCMA BsAb treatment is also feasible in several challenging subgroups, including frail patients (93% agreement) and those with high-risk cytogenetics (93%), extramedullary disease (93%), end-stage renal disease (86%), active plasma cell leukemia (79%), and central nervous system involvement (67%). In addition, agreement (93%) was reached on the possible sequential use of BCMA-targeting therapies, preferentially BsAbs following CAR-T, though a switch in the target antigen should primarily be considered.
conclusionsIn this article, we address the main challenges related to the real-world use of anti-BCMA BsAbs in patients with TCE RRMM, offering expert recommendations to complement existing guidelines and support clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.