ArticleCancers2026
A Multi-Layered Proteogenomic Framework for the Prioritization of Cell Surface Therapeutic Targets: Proof-of-Concept for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Article in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIdentification of tumor-specific cell surface targets is a critical step in the development of precision oncology therapeutics, including radioligand- and antibody-based approaches. However, existing strategies often rely on single-layer analyses and lack systematic integration of proteomic, genomic, and clinical metadata.
methodsWe developed a multi-layered proteogenomic filtering framework integrating quantitative proteomics from colorectal cancer (CRC) cohorts with curated metadata on protein localization, normal tissue expression, and druggability. Eleven complementary filtering strategies were applied, followed by manual curation for extracellular accessibility and composite scoring based on protein rank, localization, and clinical relevance.
resultsApplication of the pipeline to metastatic CRC (mCRC) identified multiple high-confidence candidate targets, including GPRC5A, SLC2A1, CD47, DPEP1 and IFITM1. The average pairwise overlap between filtering strategies was low (0.11), indicating limited redundancy and complementary target identification across approaches. Importantly, candidates detected by multiple strategies were significantly enriched for established biomarkers (FAP, CEACAM5, ITGAV, ITGB4), which were exclusively found among multi-strategy candidates (10.3% vs. 0%; Fisher's exact test,
conclusionsThis study presents a scalable framework for prioritization of cell surface therapeutic targets, using mCRC as proof-of-concept indication. By integrating multiple data layers and incorporating translational criteria early in the discovery process, this approach may facilitate more efficient identification of targets for downstream development, including antibody- and radioligand-based therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.