Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42649884›Full record

ArticleCancers2026

A Multi-Layered Proteogenomic Framework for the Prioritization of Cell Surface Therapeutic Targets: Proof-of-Concept for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Jostein Dahle, Sebastian Patzke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jostein DahleAhus Cancer Research Center, Akershus University Hospital, 1478 Lørenskog, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-1447-6005
Sebastian PatzkebioMérieux Norge, Hoffsveien 21, 0275 Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-6821-197X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentification of tumor-specific cell surface targets is a critical step in the development of precision oncology therapeutics, including radioligand- and antibody-based approaches. However, existing strategies often rely on single-layer analyses and lack systematic integration of proteomic, genomic, and clinical metadata.

methodsWe developed a multi-layered proteogenomic filtering framework integrating quantitative proteomics from colorectal cancer (CRC) cohorts with curated metadata on protein localization, normal tissue expression, and druggability. Eleven complementary filtering strategies were applied, followed by manual curation for extracellular accessibility and composite scoring based on protein rank, localization, and clinical relevance.

resultsApplication of the pipeline to metastatic CRC (mCRC) identified multiple high-confidence candidate targets, including GPRC5A, SLC2A1, CD47, DPEP1 and IFITM1. The average pairwise overlap between filtering strategies was low (0.11), indicating limited redundancy and complementary target identification across approaches. Importantly, candidates detected by multiple strategies were significantly enriched for established biomarkers (FAP, CEACAM5, ITGAV, ITGB4), which were exclusively found among multi-strategy candidates (10.3% vs. 0%; Fisher's exact test,

conclusionsThis study presents a scalable framework for prioritization of cell surface therapeutic targets, using mCRC as proof-of-concept indication. By integrating multiple data layers and incorporating translational criteria early in the discovery process, this approach may facilitate more efficient identification of targets for downstream development, including antibody- and radioligand-based therapies.

Indexed as

cell surface proteinscolorectal cancermetastatic colorectal cancerproteogenomicstarget discoverytarget prioritizationtherapeutic targets

Identifiers

PMID42649884
PMCPMC13511108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.