ReviewCancers2026
Anticancer Properties of Imidazolium Salt Derivatives: Current Advances and Therapeutic Perspectives.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Imidazolium salt derivatives (IMSDs) represent a structurally diverse class of compounds that has attracted increasing interest as a source of novel anticancer agents due to their tunable chemical architecture and broad spectrum of biological activities. This review summarizes current advances in the development of organic imidazolium derivatives and metal-N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) complexes, with particular emphasis on their structure-activity relationships (SARs), mechanisms of action, and therapeutic potential. Numerous IMSDs exhibit significant antiproliferative activity against a wide range of cancer cell lines through multiple mechanisms, including DNA damage, reactive oxygen species generation, mitochondrial dysfunction, thioredoxin reductase inhibition, cell-cycle arrest, and apoptosis induction. Among the reported compounds, Au(I)-, Pt(II)-, and Ag(I)-NHC complexes consistently demonstrate the highest cytotoxic potency, whereas hybrid derivatives incorporating pharmacologically active moieties, such as lithocholic acid, have been investigated as potential approaches to improving selectivity and multitarget activity. Current SAR analyses indicate that metal coordination, bulky aromatic substituents, molecular hybridization, and balanced lipophilicity are key determinants of enhanced biological activity. Despite these encouraging findings, most available evidence is limited to in vitro studies, while comprehensive in vivo evaluation, pharmacokinetic characterization, and systematic toxicological assessment remain insufficient. Consequently, the clinical relevance of these compounds has yet to be established. Future research should focus on rational structural optimization, standardized preclinical evaluation, combination therapies, and advanced drug delivery strategies, including nanomedicine, to facilitate the translation of IMSDs into clinically useful anticancer agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.