ArticleCancers2026
Immune Absence as a Proposed Framework for Delayed Relapse After Curative-Intent Treatment in Human Papillomavirus-Associated Cervical Cancer.
Article in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Delayed relapse after curative-intent treatment remains difficult to explain and predict in human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cervical cancer, including after periods of sustained remission with undetectable circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) or circulating HPV DNA. This limitation of tumor-centered surveillance demands the evaluation of immune parameters alongside tumor-derived biomarkers. We propose "immune absence" as a hypothesis-generating, operational framework referring to the sustained reduction or non-persistence of pre-specified tumor-reactive T-cell receptor (TCR) clonotypes in serial peripheral blood samples, obtained during minimal residual disease states in which antigen exposure may be limited or intermittent. We hypothesize that this longitudinal pattern may precede molecular or clinical evidence of relapse in a subset of patients and coexist with established mechanisms, such as tumor evolution, immune escape, T-cell dysfunction, and therapeutic resistance. Integrating serial ctDNA or circulating HPV DNA measurements with tumor-reactive TCR clonotype dynamics may provide complementary information on residual tumor burden and the persistence of circulating tumor-reactive T-cell responses. Peripheral blood TCR non-detection does not establish complete loss of anti-tumor immunity and may reflect compartmentalized immunity, clonal replacement, antigenic evolution, or assay limitations. Prospective longitudinal studies are required to establish the prognostic value of this framework before clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.