ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Simplified Model of the Knee for Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee Simulation.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A clinical observation of a previously asymptomatic native knee developing a relevant coronal alignment change after total hip arthroplasty (THA) motivated this research. This raised the question of whether the native knee morphology could influence the response to biomechanical changes elsewhere in the lower limb. First, we developed a simplified finite element model incorporating the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification. We developed a simplified model of the knee, where we represented the lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) by physically rotating the femur, and to avoid remodeling the tibia coronal plane for each simulation, we represented the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) by adjusting the neutral angle of the joint (the angle at which the joint generates no reaction force). This allowed for quick parametric iteration over the CPAK input space, showing which type of knees were more vulnerable to extreme valgus (CPAK III) and varus (CPAK VII) due to their morphology. The simplicity of this model will also enable users with less technical expertise to quickly obtain insights into specific knee morphologies, without requiring deep knowledge about finite element modeling. This existing model lays the foundation for later work, with a deeper look into how changes to hip morphology build on the pre-existing tendencies to varus and valgus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.