ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Intra-Session Repeatability of Static Pedobarometric Measurements: Analysis of Variability in Plantar Pressure Parameters and the Spatial Localization of the Center of Pressure and Peak Pressure.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Static pedobarometry is widely used to assess plantar pressure distribution and postural control; however, its clinical interpretation depends on measurement repeatability and reliability. The aim of our article is to evaluate the repeatability of plantar pressure parameters and the spatial localization of the center of pressure (CoP) and peak pressure (PP) during static bipedal standing. Five healthy adults underwent 30 repeated static measurements using the Sidas Press-Cam platform under standardized laboratory conditions. Analyzed parameters included contact area, mean pressure, peak pressure, and the center of pressure coordinates. Repeatability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and Bland-Altman analysis. Contact area showed high single-measure repeatability (ICC (2, 1) = 0.90). Peak pressure and mean pressure demonstrated moderate repeatability for single trials but excellent repeatability when averaged (ICC (2, k) = 0.97-0.996). The center of pressure exhibited greater mediolateral than anteroposterior variability. Peak pressure localization remained stable within 3 SD and predominantly on the dominant limb. Averaging multiple trials enhances measurement repeatability, suggesting that repeated static pedobarometric assessments may provide more consistent estimates of plantar pressure parameters. However, these findings should be interpreted as preliminary evidence from an intra-session repeatability study due to the limited sample size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.