ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Arch- and Morphology-Related Variation in Early Marginal Bone Remodeling of Monolithic Zirconia Full-Arch Prostheses: An Exploratory Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Whether arch-specific anatomical configuration affects early peri-implant bone behavior in monolithic zirconia full-arch prostheses is unclear. This prospective cohort study evaluated 40 edentulous patients with 49 monolithic zirconia full-arch prostheses (25 maxillary, 24 mandibular; 308 implants). MBR and patient-reported outcomes were recorded at baseline and 12 months; mandibular morphology (U- vs. V-shaped) was classified on CBCT, and inter-implant distance and cantilever length were measured on CAD designs. Because 9 of 40 patients contributed both arches, the primary MBR comparison used a linear mixed-effects model; morphology and geometry associations were exploratory (ANOVA; Pearson correlation). Implant and prosthetic survival were 99.4% and 97.9%. Mean MBR was higher in the mandibular (0.86 ± 0.06 mm) than the maxillary arches (0.73 ± 0.02 mm); the mixed-effects model estimated this difference as β = 0.13 mm (95% CI: 0.10-0.16;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.