LungCNET: A High-Performance Deep CNN Model for Lung Cancer Detection Evaluated Against Widely Used CNN Benchmarks.

Lung cancer arises from mutations in lung cells, disrupting their normal growth cycle and leading to uncontrolled cell division. These rapidly dividing cells lose function and fail to form healthy lung tissue. Several factors contribute to the difficulty of diagnosing and classifying lung nodules, including the high degree of morphological heterogeneity and overlapping characteristics between benign and malignant nodules. Recently, deep learning models have been used in computed tomography (CT)-based lung nodule diagnosis and have demonstrated diagnostic efficiency comparable to that of radiologists. This study introduces LungCNET, a high-performance multi-layer deep convolutional neural network trained on chest CT images to improve lung lesion classification efficiency and accuracy significantly. The data for the Lung Cancer convolutional neural network (LungCNET) were derived from the IQ-OTH/NCCD CT scan dataset (1097 images from 110 cases), split into training (767 images), validation (109) and a held-out test partition (221) that played no role in training or model selection. This dataset encompasses three diagnostic categories: benign, malignant, and normal lung tissues. LungCNET was evaluated against fine-tuned benchmark models that are both established and widely used, spanning architectures introduced between 2014 and 2024, including VGG16, ResNet50, InceptionV3, MobileNetV2, and YOLOv11. On the held-out test partition, LungCNET reached a macro-averaged F1-score of 95.19%, with VGG16 at 94.09% and InceptionV3 at 92.28%; these three models performed comparably, and the separation between them is small relative to the resolution of a test set of this size. LungCNET was, however, the only model to exceed 90% F1-score across all three diagnostic classes simultaneously, and recorded the highest F1-score on the benign class (91.0%), the smallest and most frequently misclassified category, where two of the six models failed entirely. These results support LungCNET as a candidate tool for lung cancer diagnosis, subject to validation on larger and independently sourced datasets.