ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Evidence-Guided Multimodal Risk Prediction Framework for Severe COVID-19 Outcomes Using EHR and CT Imaging for COVID-19 Clinical Decision Support.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early identification of COVID-19 patients requiring intensive care is critical for improving treatment prioritization, supporting clinical decision-making, and managing limited hospital resources. While structured electronic health record (EHR) data provide important physiological information, chest computed tomography (CT) imaging contains additional indicators related to disease severity. This study presents a multimodal clinical decision support framework for a multimodal risk prediction framework for severe COVID-19 outcomes using structured emergency clinical features and patient-level CT imaging from the COVID Data for Shared Learning (CDSL) dataset. After multimodal cohort construction, 784 patients with both structured clinical records and CT imaging were included in the analysis. Three predictive settings were evaluated: EHR-only prediction using Gradient Boosting, CT-only prediction using ResNet50-based feature extraction with Logistic Regression, and multimodal prediction using weighted late fusion. The experimental results indicate that the CT-based model surpassed the clinical baseline, yielding an F1-score of 0.42 and an ROC-AUC of 0.772, whereas the EHR-only model achieved scores of 0.30 and 0.715, respectively. Overall, the multimodal fusion framework achieved the strongest results among the approaches tested, reaching an F1-score of 0.47 and an ROC-AUC of 0.782. Taken together, these findings indicate that, although CT imaging alone carries meaningful predictive power for evaluating ICU risk, combining it with clinical data leads to predictions that are more reliable and robust. The proposed framework offers a practical and interpretable foundation for multimodal clinical decision support and demonstrates the potential of combining structured clinical data with medical imaging for intelligent critical care applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.