ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Deep Learning-Based Temporal Gait Analysis Using a Smartphone IMU in Older Adults with and Without Non-Specific Low Back Pain.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate gait event detection using inertial measurement units (IMUs) is essential for temporal gait analysis, but frame-level detection is challenged by sparse initial contact (IC) and foot-off (FO) events. This study evaluated recurrent neural network architectures and training strategies for simultaneous IC and FO detection using a single shank-mounted smartphone IMU. The internal dataset included 28 healthy older adults and 18 individuals with non-specific low back pain (NSLBP). Temporal label expansion substantially improved validation performance for gated recurrent unit (GRU) and long short-term memory models, whereas point-label and class-weighted training performed poorly. The selected label-expanded GRU (LE-GRU) achieved F1 scores above 0.95 for both events and mean absolute temporal errors below 12 ms on held-out internal test folds, with high performance in both cohorts. On an external dataset with different sensor and acquisition characteristics, high performance required full-network fine-tuning, indicating the need for adaptation across datasets. Stance phase and stride time calculated from LE-GRU-predicted events showed high agreement with reference-derived values, with Lin's concordance correlation coefficients from 0.980 to 0.994. These findings demonstrate that temporal label expansion enables accurate GRU-based gait event detection and temporal gait analysis from data collected with a single smartphone IMU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.