Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42649810›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Smart Cardiac ICU: Digital Integration, Predictive Analytics, and Perioperative Inflammation.

Leonard Azamfirei, Mihaly Veres, Sanziana Bora, Mirela Cecilia Oiaga, Mihaela Butiulca, Alexandra Elena Lazar, Janos Szederjesi, Bianca Liana Grigorescu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Leonard AzamfireiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures, 540142 Targu Mures, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-3220-2267
Mihaly VeresDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures, 540142 Targu Mures, Romania.
Sanziana BoraDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Emergency Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases and Transplantation, 540136 Targu Mures, Romania.
Mirela Cecilia OiagaDoctoral School of Medicine and Pharmacy, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures, 540139 Targu Mures, Romania.
Mihaela ButiulcaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures, 540142 Targu Mures, Romania.ORCID 0009-0003-9666-0862
Alexandra Elena LazarDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures, 540142 Targu Mures, Romania.
Janos SzederjesiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures, 540142 Targu Mures, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-9359-6058
Bianca Liana GrigorescuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures, 540142 Targu Mures, Romania.

Funding

European Union under the Health Programme of the Ministry of Investments and European Pro-jects and implemented through the Managing Authority for the Health Programme 100455/29.08.2025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contemporary intensive care operates in an environment with high-complexity cases, large volumes of information, and vast physiological, biological, and therapeutic data, collected from laboratory results, investigations, and therapies for organ support, as well as from systems that operate in parallel. The lack of interoperability contributes to information overload, alarm fatigue, and delayed decision-making. The Smart ICU concept has been developed to address these limitations by integrating medical devices, information systems, and artificial intelligence into a unified system that allows interoperable data integration and predictive analytics. Aim: The purpose of this article is to provide a narrative review of the Smart ICU concept, with a specific focus on the cardiac intensive care unit. It summarizes Smart ICU architecture, data integration, clinical support, and applicability in monitoring perioperative inflammation in cardiac surgery. We describe the Smart ICU architecture, from data acquisition to storage and analytics, highlighting the differences between Smart ICU, artificial intelligence, and Tele-ICU, and we underline predictive analytics as a supportive tool, as well as its influence on clinical outcomes. Cardiac ICU application: Cardiac ICUs offer a data-dense, temporally well-defined model following cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, where data concerning patients' hemodynamics, perfusion data, and biological and inflammatory markers intertwine. Cardiac Smart ICU models could recognize early signs of hemodynamic compromise and low cardiac output states and identify early indicators of post-cardiac surgery complications. Neutrophil activation and complete blood count-derived indices may be used as dynamic biological data for Smart Cardiac ICU models. Conclusion: The Smart Cardiac ICU may support earlier risk stratification, and therefore earlier diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, but its clinical value requires prospective, multicenter validation. Cardiopulmonary bypass-induced inflammation may offer an ideal setting to integrate physiological, procedural, and immunological data into bedside predictive models.

Indexed as

cardiac surgerycardiopulmonary bypassclinical decision supportinteroperabilityperioperative inflammationpredictive analyticssmart ICU

Identifiers

PMID42649810
PMCPMC13509940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.