ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Seeing Skin Tone Differently: An Experimental Comparison of Objective Measurements and Subjective Perceptions.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human skin tone is an important consideration in pulse oximetry and evaluating skin health conditions. Various tools are available to measure skin tone, including visual scales, palette based estimations, and optical sensor based devices. The objective of this experimental study is to compare common skin tone measurement methods. We used Fitzpatrick Skin Type (self- and observer-reported), Pantone SkinTone Guide, Delfin SkinColorCatch, and Nix Spectro 2 devices to measure the forehead skin tone of 52 participants. We compared measurements in L*a*b color space and in individual typology angles (ITA). We observed statistically significant correlation between methods, including in specific color space components (L* and ITA). Between the device measurements, we observed discrepancies in ITA values. Such discrepancies, together with a lack of standard or ground truth method, show a need for further research into skin tone measurement. We suggest in the interim that research and clinical work adopt protocols that take current methodological limitations into consideration, for example through the parallel use of different methods if applicable. Further work is needed to develop validated, reliable and consistent skin tone measurement tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.