ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
An Adaptive Multi-Representation Fusion Framework for EMG Pattern Recognition in Transradial Amputees.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electromyography (EMG)-based pattern recognition is a key enabling technology for intuitive upper-limb prosthetic control; however, amputee EMG signals show substantial intersubject variability and nonstationary characteristics, which can limit the effectiveness of conventional fixed feature representations. This study proposes an Adaptive Multi-Representation Fusion Framework that combines an enhanced Adaptive Linear Series Decomposition Learner (Adaptive LSDL) with Time-Domain Power Spectral Descriptors (TDPSD) for amputee movement classification. The proposed Adaptive LSDL extends conventional decomposition by using adaptive threshold-region optimization and multitransform signal analysis, enabling subject-specific identification of the most discriminative decomposition characteristics while preserving low computational complexity. The complementary properties of TDPSD and Adaptive LSDL are then exploited through feature-level fusion, producing a unified representation that captures both local temporal-spectral complexity and adaptive structural signal information. Experimental evaluation was conducted using the Ninapro DB3 dataset, comprising 11 transradial amputees, and a MYO armband amputee dataset, comprising 6 transradial amputees. Subject-specific five-fold cross-validation was performed using a Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) classifier. Adaptive LSDL consistently improved performance relative to the original fixed-threshold LSDL representation, while fusion improved classification accuracy for 7 of 11 DB3 amputees and 5 of 6 MYO amputees. The largest fusion gains reached 4.39 and 5.60 percentage points for the DB3 and MYO cohorts, respectively. Furthermore, the proposed framework demonstrated competitive performance relative to a lightweight real-time convolutional neural network benchmark while requiring substantially lower computational complexity. These findings indicate that adaptive decomposition and representation-level information fusion provide an effective approach for exploiting subject-specific neuromuscular information while remaining suitable for computationally efficient prosthetic control applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.