ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Machine Learning Integrating SERF-MEG and VEP for Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis of Optic Neuropathies.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visual evoked potential (VEP) is widely used to assess optic nerve function, but its ability to differentiate optic neuropathies remains limited. This study investigated the diagnostic value of spin-exchange relaxation-free magnetoencephalography (SERF-MEG), alone and in combination with VEP, using machine learning. A total of 142 eyes, including 71 healthy controls (HC), 34 eyes with optic neuritis (ON), and 37 eyes with ischemic optic neuropathy (ION), were enrolled. Three feature sets were constructed from VEP, SERF-MEG, and their combination. Repeated stratified 5-fold nested cross-validation was used to evaluate nine supervised machine learning algorithms, and SHAP analysis was used to evaluate the interpretability of the models. The multilayer perceptron model obtained an AUC of 0.792 and an MCC of 0.470, whereas the combination VEP-MEG model performed the best in differentiating HC from optic neuropathies. The MEG model fared better than the VEP and combined models for distinguishing ON from ION, with logistic regression obtaining the greatest AUC of 0.847. Cortical network measurements and visually evoked response properties were found to contribute the most to model prediction, according to SHAP analysis. These results imply that SERF-MEG may enhance the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of optic neuropathies by offering supplementary neurophysiological data beyond traditional VEP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.