ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Displacement Forces in Different Proximal Landing Zones for Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: Towards Patient-Specific Assessment.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is one of the main treatments, together with open aortic repair, for thoracic aortic aneurysm. This procedure is associated with low procedural morbidity and mortality and provides satisfactory mid-term results. However, identifying the optimal location for device deployment before the operation remains essential. In previous studies, computer simulations were used to examine the hemodynamic stress linked to different areas of the arch, pinpointing regions unsuitable for TEVAR delivery. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations suggest that zone 3 poses the most challenges for delivering endograft in type III arches, as it is considered a hostile region from biomechanical and hemodynamic perspectives. Morphologically, type III aortic arch shows a more pronounced curvature and a lower position of the arch, resulting in increased separation between the ascending and descending aorta. However, these studies utilized 3D geometrical models reconstructed from computed tomography angiography scans. Still, the flow boundary conditions were based on existing data rather than the specific hemodynamic characteristics of the patient. To bridge this gap, the present study uses MRI flow wave data to compute displacement forces (DFs) for each proximal landing zone. We found that zones 0 and 3 exhibited a high magnitude of displacement forces. Still, only zone 3 was identified as the most hemodynamically stressed area when the force was normalized for the lumen area. Furthermore, there was a significant discontinuity in the upward components of DFs between zone 2 and zone 3. The patient-specific assessment of displacement forces enabled us to identify suboptimal areas for TEVAR delivery, suggesting that personalized computer simulations could greatly enhance preoperative planning for TEVAR procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.