ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
LLM-Assisted Interpretation of Kinematic Gait Data in Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Pilot Study on Gait Deviation Detection and Surgical Group Recommendations.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional instrumented gait analysis is widely used to guide surgical decision-making in children with cerebral palsy (CP), but its interpretation is time-consuming and prone to inter-rater variability. In this single-centre pilot study, we investigated whether a generative large language model (LLM) could consistently generate gait deviation findings and surgical procedure suggestions that align with expert judgement. Kinematic features for lower-limb joints across the gait cycle, stance, and swing were extracted from eight children with unilateral CP using the open-source GaitSharing Toolkit and a structured prompt, then submitted three times per patient to OpenAI's GPT-5.5 model. The model assessed 28 kinematic deviations and 12 surgical procedure groups using majority voting. One gait analyst and two paediatric orthopaedic surgeons independently rated outputs on a 0-2 ordinal scale, blinded to all clinical information beyond the kinematic curves and diagnosis. Agreement was summarised descriptively as the percentage of the maximum attainable score with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and quadratic-weighted Cohen's kappa was used to quantify inter-surgeon agreement. Agreement with the gait expert was highest at the hip (90.6%) and lowest at the knee, particularly in the transverse plane (65.2%). For surgical procedures, agreement with the LLM reached 83.9% and 73.4% for the two surgeons, with the tibialis anterior procedure showing the lowest concordance. Inter-surgeon agreement was 79.2% (95% CI 71.9-85.4) with a kappa of 0.59 (0.47-0.70), indicating moderate agreement. The LLM showed high self-consistency (>90% across runs). These preliminary findings suggest that generative LLMs may be feasible as assistive tools in clinical gait analysis for deviation detection and future treatment planning and should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating, warranting confirmation in larger, more diverse cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.